Another Islamic cleric recently made it permissible for the
Islamic fighters waging a jihad in Syria—politely known as “the
opposition”—to r*pe the nation’s women.
Salafi Sheikh Yasir al-’Ajlawni, a Jordanian of origin who earlier
lived in Damascus, Syria for 17 years, posted a YouTube video last week
where he said he was preparing to issue a “legitimate fatwa” making it
legal (in the eyes of Islam) for those Muslims fighting to topple
secular president Bashar Assad and install Sharia law to “capture and
have s*x with” all
non-Sunni women, specifically naming Assad’s own
sect, the Alawites, as well as the Druze and several others, in short,
all non-Sunnis and non-Muslims.
The sheikh used Islam’s legitimate Arabic term for these hapless,
non-Muslim women, melk al-yamin, a phrase that appears in Islam’s sacred
book, the Koran, and which is simply a reference to non-Muslim
s*x-slaves.
For example, Koran 4:3 commands Muslim men to “Marry such women as
seem good to you, two and three and four… or what your right hands
possess.”
Islam’s ulema, or “scholars,” are unanimously agreed that “what your
right hands possess” is, according to Islamic law, simply a s*x-slave.
Linguistic evidence further suggests that she is seen more as an animal
or a possession than a human—hence this inhuman fatwa.
Jordanian Sheih Yasir al-’Ajlawni is certainly not the first cleric
to legitimize the r*pe of infidel women in recent times. Calls to
capture and r*pe non-Muslim women are appearing with increasing
frequency from all corners of the Islamic world.
A few months earlier, Saudi preacher Muhammad al-Arifi also issued a
fatwa allowing jihadi fighters to engage in “intercourse marriage” with
captive Syrian women that lasts for a few hours “in order to give each
fighter a turn”—also known as gang-r*pe.
Then there is Egyptian Sheikh Ishaq Huwaini, who once lectured on how
infidel captives, or to use another term from the Koran, ghanima, the
“spoils of war,” are to be distributed among the jihadis and taken to
“the slave market, where slave-girls and concubines are sold.”
He, too, referred to such women as “what your right hands possess,”
saying: “You go to the market and buy her, and she becomes like your
legal mate—though without a contract, a guardian, or any of that
stuff—and this is agreed upon by the ulema… In other words, when I want a
s*x-slave, I go to the market and pick whichever female I desire and
buy her.”
Indeed, even some Muslim women advocate the enslavement
and r*pe of fellow (non-Muslim) women. Kuwaiti political activist,
Salwa al-Mutairi, for instance, is working to see the institution of
s*x-slavery return.
In a video she posted online, she explained how she once asked
Islam’s greatest authorities living in the city of Mecca, the city of
Islam, about the legality of s*x-slavery and how they all confirmed it
to be perfectly legitimate. According to Mutairi:
“A Muslim state must first attack a Christian state—sorry, I mean any
non-Muslim state—and they (the women, the future s*x-slaves) must be
captives of the raid. Is this forbidden?
Not at all, according to Islam, s*x slaves are not at all forbidden.
Quite the contrary, the rules regulating s*x-slaves differ from those
for free women (i.e., Muslim women).
The latter’s body must be covered entirely, except for her face and
hands, whereas the s*x-slave is kept unclad from the bellybutton on
up—she is different from the free woman, the free woman has to be
married properly to her husband, but the s*x-slave—he just buys her and
that’s that.”
The Kuwaiti activist went on to offer concrete suggestions: “For
example, in the Chechnya war, surely there are female Russian captives.
So go and buy those and sell them here in Kuwait, better that than have
our men engage in forbidden s*xual relations. I don’t see any problem in
this, no problem at all.”
Source: Human Events
No comments:
Post a Comment